tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30603050.post5012100932931576693..comments2023-10-10T12:29:32.468-04:00Comments on Bleier's Blog: George Washington's Blog: Anomalies in Anthrax Suicide StoryRonaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06894911763711058827noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30603050.post-15727987263408627462008-08-05T19:06:00.000-04:002008-08-05T19:06:00.000-04:00One problem I find with your interpretation: If yo...One problem I find with your interpretation: If you wanted to blame the anthrax letters on Iraq, why not use the bacterial strain Saddam had used in the past and which (because he got it from the US in the first place) would be available to the US microbiologists? But no, they didn't.<BR/>And in the same vein: the original 2001 reports linking the anthrax to Iraq seem to have been based on govt sources claiming traces of bentonite in the letters. (supposedly, only Iraq biowarfare sources contain the stuff). If you were planning to orchestrate a panic based on the presence of bentonite in the anthrax letters and you were sending the letters, wouldn't you at least put some bentonite in the letters? Bentonite is not some exotic substance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30603050.post-48312983430408733712008-08-04T22:38:00.000-04:002008-08-04T22:38:00.000-04:00Here are the responses I received to my anthrax ma...Here are the responses I received to my anthrax mailing. I've changed people's initials to protect the guilty and innocent alike. (If you want your real initial or name listed in future, please so indicate.)<BR/><BR/>A number of people have pointed to Glenn Greenwald's excellent blog on the subject. http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/ 8.3.08<BR/><BR/>Among much else, he lists almost a dozen of the most blatant anomalies connected with this case. <BR/><BR/>btw, can anyone confirm that no autopsy will be allowed?<BR/><BR/>Ronald<BR/>***<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>M wrote:<BR/><BR/>He's about the 13th microbiologist to expire in the last few years<BR/><BR/>http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/000623.html<BR/><BR/>K wrote:<BR/><BR/>Thanks for this.<BR/><BR/>The second link didn't work, but I was able to get it by pasting http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com<BR/><BR/>into my browser window.<BR/><BR/>Greenwald's article is also very interesting.<BR/>*** <BR/><BR/>B wrote:<BR/><BR/>Ronald, read this USA article form yeas ago..<BR/><BR/>http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-10-13-anthrax-labs_x.htm<BR/><BR/> <BR/>Surely his defense would have been the sloppy practices at the lab in an attempt to show contamination of evidence brought against him to show he was the guy...<BR/><BR/>This would put to rest the spread of any other of these Ft Detrick labs to anywhere in the USA...<BR/><BR/>But more importantly he was not alone..<BR/><BR/>and that would have come out in a deal to turn state's evidence..<BR/><BR/>Now are we going to see what he evidence was that would indict him?<BR/> <BR/><BR/>No Autopsy?<BR/><BR/>What a travesty...<BR/><BR/>B.<BR/>***<BR/><BR/>L wrote:<BR/><BR/>Ron, I had all the same questions and assertions that you had on this. Will this ever end? <BR/>Be well, L.Ronaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06894911763711058827noreply@blogger.com