I’ve written earlier of my admiration for Cambridge Professor Richard J. Evans’s fluency, the extent of his learning and his indefatigable industry. I’ve also complained that I see him standing like a colossus astride the scholarly gates blocking views not to his liking. His dismissive review of a new book by Paul Kennedy, Engineers of Victory: The Problem Solvers Who Turned the Tide in the Second World War, is another case in point. In his NYRB review, “ What the War Was Really About”( December 5, 2013 distributed about two weeks earlier), Evans derides a recent example of a view I’ve recently stumbled upon, namely that Hitler had to work night and day against his military commanders to keep Germany from winning WWII, and from blocking Allied victory.
My letter to the NYRB follows:
New York Review of Books:
December 7, 2013
To the editor:
Re: Richard J. Evans, “What the War Was Really About,” NYRB , December 5, 2013.
Professor Richard J. Evans dismisses Paul Kennedy’s suggestion that the Germans might have won the war as “beside the point,” writing that “Defeat was preprogrammed for the Axis by the very nature of its war aims.”
Regarding Japan few would doubt that her resources were unequal to destroying U.S. might, nor that its “brutal and sadistic behavior” in pursuit of a Co-prosperity Sphere served to doom its prospects.
But Germany is another story. Evidence suggests that it wasn’t horrific Nazi war aims, but radical interference by Hitler himself that brought German ruin. Early victories in Operation Barbarossa unveiled remarkable and still not adequately explored possibilities. Bevin Alexander (How Hitler Could Have Won WWII: The Fatal Errors that Led to Nazi Defeat [(2000]) writes of Army Group Center’s “astonishing success” advancing 440 miles in only six weeks. With few Soviet troops in their way, Guderian’s and Hoth’s tanks were only 220 miles from Moscow when Hitler issued orders that amounted to self-sabotage. He ordered a halt to the drive on Moscow, forcing instead Center’s panzer groups south to the Ukraine and north to Leningrad. Guderian was so outraged by Hitler’s deflection orders that he struggled, ultimately unsuccessfully, to force Hitler to allow him to proceed to Moscow before the end of the summer.
Surely the possibility of an early Nazi victory over Stalin and the prospect of Hitlerian world domination are topics worthy of further study.
Sincerely,
Ronald Bleier
Saturday, December 07, 2013
Sunday, December 01, 2013
Bill the Butcher: Did Hitler Deliberately Lose the War?
Bill the Butcher: Did Hitler Deliberately Lose the War?
You wrote:
My email to Bill:
Thanks for this, Bill. Much appreciated. I'm really glad I found you via Google. Your article represents a major breakthrough. (Perhaps there are others who are also working on this?) I'm working on exactly the same theme: I'd just remove the question mark and I also believe that it wasn't at all subconscious. Hitler knew exactly what he was doing. He had developed a long term plan for destruction, including the destruction of the German military and German society along with everything else.
Thanks for the pointer to Clark on Barbarossa. I found Bevin Alexander, How Hitler Could Have Won WWII: The Fatal Errors that Led to Nazi Defeat (2000) perhaps the most helpful.
Best wishes,
Ronald
rbleier@igc.org
You wrote:
But the question is: how
is it that Hitler actually lost the war?
Think about it a moment. Here’s a man who had absolute
control over his people, his nation and his armed forces. He had more absolute
control than other dictators because he had succeeded in achieving a kind of
Godhead status amongst his people (more about that in a moment). His General Staff
was completely beholden to him, and every general who even thought of treason
had been co-opted or purged. His armies, even in their last days, were
technologically superior to all their enemies. And, militarily speaking, by
1942 he was unchallenged master of everything between the river Volga and the
English Channel. How could he possibly
have lost?
Yet, as we know from history, he did, completely and
catastrophically.
I believe, and in this article I shall endeavour to show,
that Hitler lost because, subconsciously,
he was determined to lose.
--Read the whole of Bill's blog on this topic:
Did Hitler Deliberately Lose the War?
http://bill-purkayastha.blogspot.com/2012/02/did-hitler-deliberately-lose-war.html#comment-form
Thanks for this, Bill. Much appreciated. I'm really glad I found you via Google. Your article represents a major breakthrough. (Perhaps there are others who are also working on this?) I'm working on exactly the same theme: I'd just remove the question mark and I also believe that it wasn't at all subconscious. Hitler knew exactly what he was doing. He had developed a long term plan for destruction, including the destruction of the German military and German society along with everything else.
Thanks for the pointer to Clark on Barbarossa. I found Bevin Alexander, How Hitler Could Have Won WWII: The Fatal Errors that Led to Nazi Defeat (2000) perhaps the most helpful.
Best wishes,
Ronald
rbleier@igc.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)