When Trump speaks of vote rigging he's
intending voter suppression, especially blacks. No big secret. I
suspect that until he met with Karl Rove months ago he was ignorant
of computer vote flipping; and that virtually all computer vote
counting is done on Republican controlled companies which are
routinely strategically manipulated. (See Professor Mark Crispin
Miller's recent compilation of the evidence.
http://markcrispinmiller.com/2016/11/election-theft-a-conspiracy-theory-only-an-ignoramus-or-a-troll-would-say-so-heres-the-evidence/)
One dramatic example of such flipping
I've cited in the past is the theft of the 2002 election from Don
Siegelman for governor of Alabama. It was a close race and one county
reported a set of results from electronic machines that made
Siegelman governor. Then in the middle of the night the computers
recalculated and reported a different set of results. He lost the
race. (He now sits in jail, afterwards railroaded by Karl Rove and
his cronies. President Obama refuses to pardon Siegelman, nor did the
White House make any effort to intervene to keep him out of jail in
the first place.
Computer vote flipping to reverse
election results on a state and local level goes back to the 90s if
not before. On a national, presidential level I'm not aware of such
interventions till 2000 when the votes in Florida were flipped to
give the race to George W. Bush. In 2004 the flippers learned their
lesson and they made sure it wouldn't be close and they gave the
national vote to Bush as well as shifting the electoral college. Is it
amazing that they could get away with giving the election to someone
who was so deeply unpopular after four years in office, not least
because of Iraq? Kerry was well aware that Ohio was stolen but he
turned out to be one of a long line of Democrats who didn't want to
be president. He apparently was also briefed on the the long planned US attack to retake Falluja which would
have to be indefinitely postponed if he contested the election.
Needless to say the major media – as
well as the left alternative media – are unwilling to report on
such high level hijacking of a presidential election. One symptom
that they prefer to look the other way is that is that they refuse
to engage in exit polling in critical areas which would reveal the
discrepancy between official results and how people actually voted.
Interestingly, a similar high profile
signal of election rigging happened in two presidential elections --
in 2012 and in 2000. In 2000 Florida was so clearly won by Gore that
the TV media were calling it for the Democrats by around 10 pm. Soon
a surprise national interview was granted by the Bush family as
they watched the results on TV in their hotel room. The Bush spokesperson
warned that no matter how clearly the results in Florida seemed, the
Bush camp were still confident it would change in their favor. In
hindsight, we can deduce that that they preparing the country for a
contested election, not to mention that the fix was in.
On the evening of the 2012 election,
despite the overwhelming numbers, Karl Rove also tipped his hand that
he had intended to reverse a potential Obama victory. Search: "Karl
Rove's election night melt-down on Fox News." On national TV
he kept insisting that it wasn't over, that late results would swing
the race to Romney.
For the latest iteration in computer
vote flipping see http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/
