Wednesday, October 01, 2008

$700 Billion Debacle: It's Obama, Dummy!

Once again it appears that in a matter of days Treasury Secretary Paulson will have the effectively unfettered authority to dole out billions to those who shouldn’t get it while doing little or nothing to aid the current credit crunch.

Journalist Chris Floyd puts the Democrats’ position succinctly:

Nothing -- absolutely nothing -- could be politically safer than opposing George W. Bush. And yet the entire Democratic leadership, Barack Obama included, lined up to support a cockamamie plan proposed by this scorned and shriveled figure, a plan that was transparently nothing more than an audacious raid on the Treasury by Big Money hoods and yet another authoritarian power grab by a gang of murderous, torturing, warmongering toadies. This was the plan and these were the people that the Democrats decided to fight for.
(Thanks to Xymphora for the pointer.)

Once again, the question: why is this happening? Why are the Democrats voting for Bush/Cheney/Paulson’s plan which will have the effect of further destabilizing the national and international economy when all their constituents (200-1, I've heard) are telling them not to bail out Wall Street?

Thanks to Dennis Kucinich on Democracy Now (9/29) we have the answer: It’s Obama. It almost makes you wish Hillary won. We would have expected it from her. The only question is whether FISA was a bigger betrayal. On the bright side we’re learning something. We’re learning the depths to which Obama will go to please and reassure his corporate sponsors.

Here’s the relevant exchange on Democracy Now:

AMY GOODMAN: Congressman Kucinich, can you explain how it is that the Democrats are in charge, yet the Democrats back down on their demand to give bankruptcy judges authority to alter the terms of mortgages for homeowners facing foreclosure, that Democrats also failed in their attempt to steer a portion of any government profits from the package to affordable housing programs?

REP. DENNIS KUCINICH: Well, I mean, those are two of the most glaring deficiencies in this bill. And I would maintain there was never any intention to—you know, well, many members of Congress had the intention of helping people who were in foreclosure. You know, this—Wall Street doesn’t want to do that. Wall Street wants to grab whatever change they can and equity that’s left in these properties. So—

AMY GOODMAN: Right, but the Democrats are in charge of this.

REP. DENNIS KUCINICH: Right. You know, I’ll tell you something that we were told in our caucus. We were told that our presidential candidate, when the negotiations started at the White House, said that he didn’t want this in this bill. Now, that’s what we were told.

AMY GOODMAN: You were told that Barack Obama did not want this in the bill?

REP. DENNIS KUCINICH: That he didn’t want the bankruptcy provisions in the bill. Now, you know, that’s what we were told. And I don’t understand why he would say that, if he did say that. And I think that there is a—the fact that we didn’t put bankruptcy provisions in, that actually we removed any hope for judges to do any loan modifications or any forbearance. There’s no moratorium on mortgage foreclosures in here. So, who’s getting—who’s really getting helped by this bill? This is a bailout, pure and simple, of Wall Street interests who have been involved in speculation.

And I don’t, for the life of me, understand why this is going to do anything to address the underlying problems in the economy, which actually had to do with the recklessness. This is what the president of the Federal Reserve Bank in Dallas said, that—and, you know, I might have the actual quote here. Listen to this quote: he said, “The seizures and convulsions we’ve experienced in the debt and equity markets have been the consequences of a sustained orgy of excess and reckless behavior, not a too tight monetary policy.” This is the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank president, Richard Fisher.

So, you know, we’re getting stampeded here to vote for something that doesn’t help homeowners, that doesn’t do anything about foreclosures, that doesn’t help those people who have been in bankruptcy and are looking for a way out. As a matter of fact, it made sure they can’t get out. So, who’s this for? It’s for speculators. It’s to play a game that provides some temporary help in the market, and, you know, you might see an uptick today if this passes the House. On the other hand, if it doesn’t, we need to be ready to find a way for Wall Street to address its problems without having to tap the increasingly diminishing resources of the federal taxpayers.


Read the entire Kucinich interview at:

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/29/is_this_the_united_states_congress

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Hi Ronald,

I agree with your observations.

Left, right, democratic, republican, it makes no difference to the outcome of this charade.

Centralising power has been the favoured strategy of the rich throughout history. The depression during the 30's was orchestrated, now we're seeing a similar plan on a much bigger scale.

We all understand that debt equals slavery. If the governments of the world control the banking system (or 'rescue' it) then all of the public debt becomes government controlled. Or rather, if the powerful few, behind the government...

We hear how the IMF is proposing that a world financial governing system is 'necessary' in order to prevent a repeat of current events. Yeah that's right, we'll hand over all of our savings, trust and hard work to the corrupt few so they can control every portion of our lives. This capitalist system, built on the principle that debt equals slavery (not unlike a feudal system) owes it's short lived success to our general ignorance and greed. It's a system now reaping a long overdue karmic harvest and yet the banksters complain they won't be receiving a six figure bonus this year!

'Bill hoardings advertise products that nobody needs
While angry from manchester writes to complain about
All the repeats on t.v.
And computer terminals report some gains
On the values of copper and tin
While american businessmen snap up van goghs
For the price of a hospital wing'

Coupled with the new plans for Codex Alimentarius as of Dec 2009 we might as well don the lab rat tags and get busy looking for the illusive maze cheese:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=451097355502728465

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=157

A change of leadership personnel is irrelevant when the whole world is being led off a cliff. We need to change tracks completely and that comes from a change of mindset.

Here's a great site for reading between the lines:

http://www.urbansurvival.com/week.htm

Many thanks,
Pete, UK