Friday, October 01, 2010

A summary or précis of Walid Khalidi ‘s article “The Hebrew Reconquista of Palestine” in the Autumn 2009 issue of the Journal of Palestine Studies  has been posted on the DESIP website at:

http://desip.igc.org/MiddleEast/khalidiMEReconquista.htm 

Professor Khalidi’s article, about twice as long as the précis, addresses some of the myths regarding the transformation of the former Palestine into the State of Israel. 

Here are a few selections from the summary. 

Since the issue [of who should inherit Palestine was divine right], questions of who fired the first shot, and who did or did not accept partition are mere diversions and irrelevancies.

 

The genius of the Zionist narrative is its ability to depict the Palestinians’

resistance to this plan to dispossess them as Palestinian aggression, and the

Zionist drive to impose this revolutionary status quo on the Palestinians by force

of arms as Jewish self-defense. 

Aggression and offensive action were built into the very concept of the UN

partition resolution. The area of the proposed Jewish state was 15 million dunams

(1 dunam = 1,000 sq meters) while Jewish land ownership in 1948 totaled 1.7

million dunams. The UN was effectively saying to the Yishuv: go seize those

additional 13.3 million dunams that you don’t own from those who do.

 

The outcome of the [1948] regular war was already sealed in favor of Israel by the time it

began. The “existential threat” supposedly posed by the Arab armies, like the

ostensible equity and moral viability of the UN partition resolution, is a myth.


 Ben Gurion was without doubt the most capable political leader operating in the

Middle East in the 40s and 50s. He had his priorities right. Unlike the leaders of

the Irgun and Stern gang who fought the British, Ben Gurion understood that the

real enemy was the Palestinians and Arabs. (Although one could argue that it

came down to a question of shared responsibility: Stern and Irgun would fight the

British-–with discreet help from Ben Gurion–-and so Ben Gurion could devote the

bulk of his energies to uprooting the natives.)

 

Perhaps the mother of all ironies is that Ben-Gurion spent 1916 researching the

history of Palestine in—of all places—the New York Public Library. One of the

conclusions of his research was that the Palestinian peasantry were the real

descendents of the ancient Hebrews. 

Read more:

http://desip.igc.org/MiddleEast/khalidiMEReconquista.htm

3 comments:

Ronald said...

SK wrote:
Ronald,
I read the whole thing. Awesome magnifying glass shining light on the
conspiracy against the Palestinians, possibly the true descendants of
the ancient Hebrews.
Thanks,
S

Ronald said...

HL wrote:
"One of the
conclusions of his research was that the Palestinian peasantry were the real
descendents of the ancient Hebrews."

Hey Ron - this is very interesting - what do you know about it? - H

Ronald said...

Muslehuddfin Ahmad wrote:

Dear All,
Pl. read my book- Promised Land? A Perspective on Palestinian-Israeli Conflict published by authorhouse.com
in the USA. The book can be seen in Google and available at Amazon, Barnes & Nobles, Borders, authorhouse.com etc

I have clearly established that Israelis are not the decendants of the Children of Israel (Jacob) - Bani Israel.
Israel was declared as a state unilaterally - no UNSC approval - US recognised Israel within 11 minutes of the declaration, but recognised it as state of Israel and not a Jewish state.
Many other facts are there.
You all will do me a favor if you read the book and send me your comments for next edition review.
Warm regards,
Muslehuddfin Ahmad
Former Ambassador
& President/ Vice Chancellor of North South university, Dhaka, Bangladesh