My  12 page, 4,000 world article,  “Jack 
Cashill’s Expose: Who wrote Obama’s Dreams from My Father?” 
 is available on the DESIP website.
 The article is the first of a proposed two- 
part essay under the heading: “Searching for Obama.”
Except for part of the first 
paragraph, the selections copied below are from the final sections of the 
article.
***
“Jack Cashill’s Expose: Who 
wrote Obama’s Dreams from My Father?” 
                                                             
by Ronald Bleier
In early 2011 on CSPAN’s Book TV program I watched author Jack Cashill present his controversial and startling theory regarding Obama’s memoir, Dreams from My Father (1995). Summarizing the findings he set out in his recently published Deconstructing Obama,[i] Cashill contended that Obama’s memoir was ghostwritten by Bill Ayers.
…
Authorship of Dreams-- A Matter of Importance?
The  question of whether Dreams from My 
Father  was ghostwritten or not rose 
above the trivial for me because  by 
early 2011 I had come to believe that President Obama had been relentlessly 
pursuing an extremist right-wing Republican agenda.   In foreign policy he continued and escalated 
the destructive militarism of his predecessors revealing a lack of compassion 
and ruthlessness that rivaled his bloody predecessors. I felt that Oliver Stone 
was not exaggerating when he termed President Obama “a wolf in sheep’s clothing” 
referencing his militarism and his efforts to scuttle Constitutional rights of 
due process. Domestically Obama has promoted and continues to favor a damaging 
program of austerity and tax cuts, including the more than a trillion in tax 
cuts that he has already pushed through in 2009 and 2010[ii]; with apparently 
more to come in 2012-2013. 
The argument is that 
if President Obama has pursued these policies with the full awareness of the 
consequences for the economy and for his re-election (see below) it can be 
deduced that counterintuitively he prefers a hobbled economy, a weakened 
Democratic Party, an undermined and demoralized middle class—his base-- in order 
to pursue a Republican agenda of attacks on labor, the middle class, Social 
Security and Medicare.
Similarly his 
escalation and continuation of the drone strike program in Pakistan and Yemen is 
particularly egregious and telling. Critics of these attacks often point out 
that that a chief consequence of the program which reportedly kills more 
civilians than “militants” by a factor or 2 or 3 or 4 or more, is to radicalize 
the local population and in the end, create more “terrorists.” In other words, 
if the purpose of the drone program is counterterrorism, then the program is 
counterproductive—not to speak of its appalling destruction and the perilous 
precedent it sets for the future security of all nations. 
Since these effects 
must be as plain to the White House as they are to critics, the implication is 
that Obama’s “anti-terrorism” rhetoric masks a more sinister program. The drone 
program seems designed to allow free rein to the most militaristic and 
aggressive elements of the U.S.’s national security state, embodied in Obama’s 
hawkish national security advisor, John Brennan. The evident intention of the 
deadly drone attacks—not to mention other regular and special forces U.S. 
military operations-- is to wreak havoc and destabilize vulnerable areas of the 
world as part of an endless war agenda favored by extremist hawks, 
neoconservatives and others. 
Does Obama really wish to be re-elected?
If President Obama is 
a faux Democrat, a serial traitor to his party and to his core supporters, then 
it would be understandable if he were not wholly comfortable in his high profile 
leadership role. A second term would, among other things, only widen his 
exposure as a fraud, as the great deceiver,[iii] as the more 
effective evil[iv] as some are 
beginning to see.  Developments in a post 
2013 Obama administration would continue to peel away at the veils of his 
deception.  If he leaves office after 
only one term, he would be leaving, relatively speaking, at the top of his 
game.  
If he left the White 
House in January 2013 he need have no fear as to the continuation of his 
political program since he has already made giant strides in institutionalizing 
an extremist right wing and totalitarian agenda. Due to the terrible and 
groundbreaking precedents of the past decade and more, a real Republican like 
Mitt Romney should have little trouble persevering on the road to heightened 
national and international instability, global unsustainability and more 
rigorous control everywhere from the top. 
One sign that Obama is 
not deeply committed to a second term would be if his re-election campaign 
machine turns out to be not as smoothly run as it was in 2008. Could his June 
2012 political faux pas, when he allowed that “the private sector is doing fine” 
be a sign of a lack of focus or interest?  
More such blunders, as well as a campaign lacking in direction, could be 
signs of Obama’s inner intentions.
***
Read 
more:
[i] Jack Cashill, 
Deconstructing 
Obama: The Life, Loves, and Letters of America’s First Postmodern President 
(2011).
CSPAN 
Book TV aired Jack Cashill’s book talk regarding his newly published, 
Deconstructing Obama in March 2011. The Book TV website offers the 
following summary of the Cashill presentation.
Jack Cashill 
questions whether President Obama wrote his memoir, Dreams from My 
Father.  Mr. Cashill argues that 
Barack Obama was assisted in the writing of his 1995 memoir by Bill Ayers and 
contends that the President's life story is different than the one presented in 
his biography.  Jack Cashill presents his 
argument at the Kansas City Public Library in Kansas City, 
Missouri.
[ii] Jack Rasmus, 
“Obama’s Economy,” Z Magazine, April 2012.
[iv] Glenn Ford: Why 
Barack Obama is the More Effective Evil, 3.21.12,  http://blackagendareport.com/content/why-barack-obama-more-effective-evil
 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment