Friday, February 16, 2007

Why is Democracy Now joining the mainstream spin on Bush's war plans for Iran?

Why is Democracy Now ( of all people and places spinning Bush's bellicose language and tone regarding his plans for possible hostilities against Iran? Why are they toning down his aggressive remarks?

In their headlines for February 15, 2007, they lead with "Bush Backs Down on Iran-Bomb Claim." It surely must be a tortured reading of Bush's remarks to see him as backing down. That they had NPR/NYT style contextualization in mind seems clear from their choppy editing, making sure to cut the tape just before Bush's key statement, where he says with characteristic menace: "And I intend to do something about it."

For a comparable take, see Laura Rozen's for a link to the Washington Post story to the same effect: that Bush is backing down. It's quite the opposite. One reading (mine) of Bush's tortured language below, is that it doesn't matter whether the President of Iran was or wasn't involved. Bush (still) intends to do something about it.

Democracy Now should be spanked.


Excerpt:from Bush's February 14, 2007 press conference.

Q: Thank you, Mr. President.

I want to follow up on Iran one more time. Are you saying, today, that you do not know if senior members of the Iranian government are, in fact, behind these explosives?

That contradicts what U.S. officials said in Baghdad on Sunday. They said the highest levels of the Iranian government were behind this.

It also — it seems to square with what General Pace has been saying, but contradicts with what your own press secretary said yesterday. What...

BUSH: Can I — let me — I can't say it more plainly: There are weapons in Iraq that are harming U.S. troops because of the Quds Force.

As you know, I hope, the Quds Force is a part of the Iranian government. Whether Ahmadinejad ordered the Quds Force to do this, I don't think we know. But we do know that they're there.

And I intend to do something about it.

And I've asked our commanders to do something about it. And we're going to protect our troops.

Q: But given some of those contradictions, Mr. President...

BUSH: There's no contradiction that the weapons are there and they were provided by the Quds Force...

Q: What assurances can you give the American people that the intelligence this time will be accurate?

BUSH: We know they're there. We know they're provided by the Quds Force. We know the Quds Force is a part of the Iranian government. I don't think we need who picked up the phone and said to the Quds Force, Go do this, but we know it's a vital part of the Iranian government.

What matters is, is that we're responding. The idea that somehow we're manufacturing the idea that the Iranians are providing IEDs is preposterous. My job is to protect our troops. And when we find devices that are in that country that are hurting our troops, we're going to do something about it, pure and simple.

Now, David says: Does this mean you're trying to have a pretext for war? No. It means I'm trying to protect our troops. That's what that's means. And that's what the family members of our soldiers expect the commander in chief and those responsible for — responsible for our troops on the ground.

And we'll continue to do so.

No comments: